Good point. I dd a little more research to refresh my memory. They wound up having to control the A/C using differential thrust, just like the pilots had to do on UAL 232 at Sioux City.

bugged, tanks.

I see after posting the above a critical spelling error, but no 'edit' function to correct. I meant to say the RAYTHEON company.

Also, at the Pentagon on 9/11 where we were all told that AA77 crashed - with NO debris field of any Boeing 757 to be found, parts of a retired U.S. Navy A3 Skywarrior owned by and modified by Raytheon WERE recovered.

During 2007-2013 I was associated with Captain Field McConnell and CSCI forensics investigator David Hawkins in exposing the evil hands behind 911. Captain McConnell is a former 29-year command pilot with Northwest Airlines on the B-747 and also spent time as command pilot with Air Astana on the A-320, both on International Routes, and former
USAF, USN and ANG F-16 & F-4C's. Captain Dan Hanley, formerly with United Airines was also involved in uncovering the treachery.

McConnell's Fargo, North Dakota Air National Guard F-16 ‘Happy Hooligan’ pilot friends were the ones who were scrambled the morning of 9/11 from Langley.

McConnell’s 1972 Naval Academy classmate, Captain Charles "Chic" Frank Burlingame was the command pilot of American Airlines 77 - that DID NOT fly into the Pentagon. A Raytheon owned, modified, retired U.S. Navy A3 Skywarrior, launched a variant of the AGM-65 Bull Pup Maverick missile into the Pentagon and the droned Skywarrior followed. Several component parts of this aircraft were recovered from the Pentagon, including a JT-57 turbine wheel, parts of the fold-up wings, a center "box" section of the fuselage [haled out under the blue tarp], pieces of the triangular windscreen, etc. The small Skywarrior JT-57 turbine wheel is a mere one-third the size of a huge Boeing 757 engine! There were no Boeing 757 parts of any kind… save for those AA aluminum scraps that were planted on the grass and away from the building.

The same technology that was used on 9/11 is responsible for nearly ALL of the recent hull losses of other airliners including Malaysian Airlines. That technology is the QRS-11 Gyro Chip, the patent work that Hillary Clinton at The Rose Law Firm worked on.

Here’s another item you may wish to peruse: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=127834

There were NO Muslim hi-jackers with Red bandannas on any of the 9/11 aircraft. That's pure Hollywood fantasy. Droned aircraft were substituted at key points and were remotely flown into their designated targets for shock and awe.

The Mooslim thing is a cleverly scripted Mossad/Five Eyes agenda, known as switch and bait. Blame the other guy for your own misdeeds. You’ve been lied to by the U.S. Government and a complicit Big Six media with interconnecting directorates – all Zionist owned – many of whom have changed their names to protect their guilt and they have covered up many crimes, including 9/11, which today remains an unsolved murder of 3,000+ people. The suspects are still at large. And the first-responders continue dying like flies. Singer Donna Summer who was in New York at ground zero died later from breathing in the same nano-particle toxic dust.

There were NO 19-Arab/Muslim Hi-Jackers aboard ANY of the aircraft on 9/11/2001 - all pure injected media fantasy with predictive programming ahead of the event. CNN was the leader in the aftermath propaganda with its “CNN REMEMBERS” tribute which contains descriptive video and audio evidence of the crime. We were not “attacked” by Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein.

The "NEW PEARL HARBOR" that the Zionists needed to trigger the wars for an expansionist Israel was the trigger and root of 9/11 - all planned out, long in advance. The white paper authored by the Neocons like Paul Wolfowitz and company, "THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY" or PNAC detailed their plans.

You would do well to review Christopher Bollyn's excellent website https://bollyn.com/

Mr Baldwin please note the question mark. That said, and ignoring the eye-witness reports, I find it difficult to accept that a fuel-air explosion of fumes in the tank resulted in sufficient damage to bring the a/c down. However, note the question mark.